Beverly Lloyd-Lee wrote a "My Turn" article in the July 31^st Scottsdale Republic which was very interesting. It lauded Mayor Manross and Councilman Ecton for "taking the lead" in developing the city into what it is today. Aren’t there 5 other members of the city council and who also "helped" in this effort as well as past administrations who did all the ground work, whom she has totally ignored and who’s diligent work has been degradated? In addition, she disregarded the abilities and decisions of both Littlefield and Nelssen who are the one's who have the true handle on what's going on behind the scenes of the secretive Manross/Dolan Administration. They are also the only council members who work with all citizens on a regular basis.

How about the city staff, past and present, who although ordered by city Manager Jan Dolan to do her outrageous bidding, can still make some good decisions on their own until Dolan or Manross want them dumped because their loyalty has waned for a very good reason: incompetence on the part of the administration?

Our questions are very simple:

In researching this lady, we found that she has quite a wonderful reputation in the interior design industry for which she is to be commended, but absolutely nothing on any philanthropic endeavors, city planning expertise, exterior design expertise, or anything on government administration.

We found the following on line:

We thought it interesting that in the research we conducted on her background, there was not one single reference to Scottsdale Arizona, her participation in any civic activities with the exception of her service as an advisory member of a community college board in another state and in Arizona on the Jazz in Arizona board of directors.

With that being known, how can Lloyd-Lee be so knowledgeable in the wants and needs of the resident of the city of Scottsdale?

Let’s explain it this way: Our illustrious but very troubled mayor has determined that she is in deep trouble with her re-election campaign after losing most of her supporting organizations and therefore needs to use any and all individual elite members of the community necessary (who will participate) to quell the overwhelming and open dissatisfaction with the Manross/Dolan administration.

It was very interesting and even entertaining in  a way to read the BLOG which apparently belongs to Beverly Lloyd-Lee at the following internet address.

http://www.azcentral.com/blogs/index.php?blog=337&blogtype=PluggedInsr

In reading this BLOG, it is very apparent that this woman couldn’t care less about the multitudes of "regular residents" of the city unless they want all of the high density, skyscraper condos, and the supposed glitz and glamour (and crime) that come with it.

She praises the DRB and Planning Commission as the "End-All" decision makers for the city and takes to task any residents or council member who disagrees with them. She says only those with expertise should serve on the DRB & Planning Commission and feels that the council decision on "One Scottsdale" was a dismal failure.

In truth, The council NEVER voted on "One Scottsdale, the developer withdrew the application for both the height and subsidy request. If the “One Scottsdale” design gets approved by DRB, their build out will be very close, if not equal to, the same number of square feet of  mixed use development WITHOUT the additional height they requested but then withdrew. The "innovative" architecture and planning will remain.

She also states "COPP’s perennial "referendum vote" threat is dangerous for Scottsdale. COPP members and other activists need to educate themselves in city planning and architectural design before trying to dictate "what, where and how tall." Gee, really? We thought the taxpayers city-wide were supposed to have some say in what goes on in Scottsdale, not just the DRB or Planning Commission. "Activists" Mike Merrill and Bob Vairo among many others know more about planning and building design as well as the history of the city than most on the council and many within the current administration and city staff.

What Beverly Lloyd-Lee fails to tell us is how all of this glitz and glamour will fade like yesterdays flowers in a vase without water to sustain them, even for a little while. We don’t need fleeting glitz and glamour to make our city world class again. We desperately need the input and support of all residents of the city as well as a completely open and more importantly, and honest administration who has a solid vision for the future of Scottsdale (not themselves). That’s what made the city great under Mayor Drinkwater and anyone with any true understanding of the true needs of the entire city can re-establish our position world wide rather quickly.

Manross doesn’t have the ability and never has. She only has visions of her own grandeur and her only goal is for a legacy that shows her as a statesman. That's never going to happen with secrecy as her main tool!!

Nice try Beverly Lloyd-Lee but we’re not buying one single word of your feeble attempt at an "educational" editorial praising Manross as the perfect mayor or Ecton as the "perfect" council person. Your article was all "Blow" with no "GO".

 ~ Diversity or Blatant Discrimination?

Be forewarned that this will not be a politically correct article. The subject needs to be openly discussed as it currently being badly mishandled by the Manross Administration.

The Scottsdale Tribune editorial headline reads: "Issues call for open minds, civility". We agree totally to the point that all issues need to be aired and all sides need to be heard. The time for being quiet so that we don't stir up a hornets nest, thanks to our illustrious mayor, or being "politically incorrect" is long over with and the time has come to call it like it really is with direct honesty and with true diversity and discrimination in the forefront and the main direction for the resolution of the problem through healthy discussions.

We have been chastised for not addressing this subject sooner so we will address it to the best of our ability and understanding of the problem as we know it as well as the possible unfairness and unnecessary costs to the taxpayers of the city of Scottsdale.

The city of Scottsdale has a link to a website to the GLBT site which we understand is funded by taxpayer dollars which can be seen at:
 
http://www.scottsdalecvb.com/static/index.cfm?contentID=680 

The first paragraph of the website clearly states:

Scottsdale invites the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) traveler to experience the warm hospitality of our vibrant and sophisticated city. Scottsdale offers luxurious resorts, world-class shopping, over 600 restaurants, spectacular scenery, and a diverse arts and culture scene. As the premier luxury destination in the Southwest, GLBT visitors will find an open and welcoming environment to indulge your senses, relax and unwind and satisfy your craving for exquisite art and fine dining. Whether you prefer lavish resorts with manicured landscapes or modern urban boutique hotels in the middle of all the action, Scottsdale offers something for everyone. Find yourself here.

This is a wonderful and impressive statement full of diversity. The problem starts right here. You first have to see the list of businesses which are advertised on this site to see the vastness of the profits possible through discriminatory practices, click on this link:

http://www.scottsdalecvb.com/members/index.cfm?action=directory

Our first question here is straight forward. Why aren't these businesses paying for the web link instead of the taxpayers? They'll make tens of millions in profits from these visitors. Why shouldn't the taxpayers share in these profits with those profits used for other public venues such as park facilities for the handicapped children such as "Shane's Inspiration" offers (Click link below)?

 http://www.shanesinspiration.org/

The other but far more serious problem is that this entire process is totally greed driven without respect for the taxpayers or the visitors. The city manager as well as the director of the Human Relations Commission added this link to the website and targeted this particular group of people based strictly on the amount of "discretionary funds" they have available for vacations, night life, and other connected activities.

We contend that this type of action by the city administration is extremely discriminatory simply because they (GLBT, LGBT, GLAAD groups) are the only group targeted and it doesn't point very well to the advertised and supposed diversity of the city of Scottsdale by the Manross/Dolan Administration.

Where are the website links for the Canadians, Mid Westerners, Easterners, Europeans, Japanese, Asians, South & Central Americans, Australians, New Zealanders, other Islanders, as well as the blacks, browns, yellow and any other color human being who would love to be similarly invited to visit our fine city with the same words? How about the Catholics, Baptists, Jews, and other religions? Have they been offered the same service? They too all have "discretionary funds", have conventions, take vacations, and travel, but  just maybe not as much as the GLBT, LGBT, GLAAD groups but isn't this being very discriminatory in itself? Doesn't Diversity mean that all humans are included?

Economically speaking, the GLBT, LGBT, GLAAD groups are very small in numbers (10% to 15%) compared to the vast numbers (85% to 90%) that are available and love to visit Scottsdale from the other groups mentioned.

Is there some other secret reason this specific group has been chosen by the Manross/Dolan administration? We sincerely pray that isn't the case.

According to the definition of Diversity on the web:

To respect racial/ethnic, gender, cultural, disability, sexual orientation, and social differences in staff, suppliers and customers.

Isn't it obvious that the city of Scottsdale is not practicing what they preach concerning diversity? The current actions by the Manross/Dolan Administration, in our opinion, are very discriminatory toward all of us and we are a very diverse group too.

Isn't it time the city came clean and revised the entire section of the city website by;

• Having the participating businesses immediately pick up the tab for any and all costs on the website where they will possibly pick up any business from their addition to the website list of businesses,

• Immediately advertise equally for any and all racial/ethnic, gender, cultural, disability, religious, sexual orientation, and socially different persons world-wide instead of just the gay community under one heading with sub-sites for the different groups which can be chosen at will,

• Immediately offer web links to all groups/businesses equally for the same fee charged to others.

This entire problem is generated by blind, overly aggressive, out of control greed on the part of the Manross/Dolan Administration and nothing else.

We understand that there are radical individuals on both sides of the issue who will shout "foul" but the central issue still is the discriminatory actions by the city by catering to only one specific group of spenders and using taxpayers dollars to do so.

(Return to Top)

 ~ And Another One Bites the Dust!!!

Although she really needed to go anyway, reportedly, Judy Register has been booted from her job by Jan Dolan. Let's see, is that the 4th or 5th department director dumped by Dolan recently?

Maybe they made a deal with Chandler; Let Scottsdale keep Keagy and we'll give you Register at a cheaper rate. Possible? Who knows for sure. The secrecy of the Manross/Dolan is now legendary (is that good?) and can never be outguessed.

(Return to Top)

 ~ Rumors of Dolan's Imminent Departure Run Rampant

In the last few weeks, the rumors of Jan Dolan's departure have intensified greatly. We feel the first article Lesley Wright of the Scottsdale Republic wrote concerning Dolan's demise, then reversed, was in fact very true.

Jan Dolan is a huge albatross around the neck of Manross and she is acutely aware of it. To have any chance at all of winning the mayoral race, she must have Dolan fired (or step down) as soon as possible.

Dolan has seen the writing on the wall and is acutely aware of the situation as well, and from what we have heard, is proactively looking for another position outside of the valley on a very stepped up basis.

One way or the other Dolan will be gone, the sooner the better. The next election will give the majority to Nelssen and Littlefield which means they will have the fourth vote with which to fire Dolan if Manross doesn't fire her first.

(Return to Top)

 ~ Coming Next Week.........

A full expose on the WaterView, OrchidTree, and other coming bogus projects that are turning our city into a traffic clogged, over used, excessively tall, drunken, and infrastructure poor city by a council majority, the DRB, and Planning Commission totally ignoring the rules that currently exist.

These same plans are running financially strapped 85 year old ladies from their homes of 20+ years just so uncaring developers and their shills can make a buck or two and screw over the city residents with still more costs which the developers want the taxpayers to pay.

This article should be an eye opener and will be hated by the developers, etc for exposing their secrets currently only shared with the secretive majority on the council. It should also expose those council members running for council in '08 who have blatantly disregarded the wishes of the taxpayers on a regular basis.

Stay tuned.......... film at 11.

(Return to Top)

~ Another Manross/Dolan Publicity Ruse

A recent column in the Scottsdale Republic criticized three of us on the Scottsdale city Council for our measured response to a letter from the FBR Open, the Arabian Horse Show, and the Barrett-Jackson Collector Car Auction requesting that the city use some of the vacant city-owned land at Bell Road and 94th Street for event parking in January 2008.  The editorial took us to task for not immediately and automatically giving in to this request.

What would be wrong about just going along with this request?  For one thing it is not necessary, as the city has enough parking spaces to accommodate these three events next January without using this land, just as we have done in years past.

But the biggest problem with this request is that it is a public relations ploy rather than a genuine attempt to negotiate a win-win deal for all parties involved.  A copy of this letter was given to the press on the same day that it was mailed, a full two days before we received it at the city.  That is not the way to negotiate a win-win deal for all parties involved. 

I certainly want the FBR Open, the Arabian Horse Show and the Barrett-Jackson Collector Car Auction to succeed and prosper.  But as a Councilman I have a duty to negotiate the best deal for the taxpayers I was elected to represent rather than to mindlessly give in to whatever demand is getting the most publicity at the moment.  The city has already committed significant taxpayer funds to accommodating these special events and before we commit tens of millions of dollars more the taxpayers are entitled to know what kind of deal they are getting in return.  That is not "spiteful," that is sound fiscal policy. 

The strategy of sticking a moistened finger into the wind and going with whatever is popular and trendy at the moment is exactly how the city made some terrible, tax-dollar-wasting deals in the past.

Earlier this year Craig Jackson complained that he had not been able to negotiate a long-term deal with our City Manager, and, if this letter is any indication, our Mayor’s recent highly-publicized and hyped initiative to Craig has similarly fizzled. 

A few months ago Jackson suggested that a small group of Council members be designated to work out a deal with him.  When he made that statement I immediately offered to be part of that group and I stand by that commitment.  I am willing meet with the FBR Open, the Arabian Horse Show and the Barrett-Jackson Collector Car Auction as often and as long as it takes to negotiate a win-win deal for all parties involved.

What I will not do is negotiate away tax dollars via press release or make policy based on newspaper hype.

Councilman Bob Littlefield
bob@boblittlefield.com

(Return to Top)

So we have a new General Manager of WestWorld.  And guess what?  He is from out of state!  His salary is ^$145,017 annually, plus a car allowance of ^$350/month, plus additional employee benefits. 

With this great income, one would think that there is a local individual or at least State resident, who would adequately qualify.  But our City Management finds it necessary to go across country to find a new employee. 

Look what we got (?) when the City Council went to California and hired Jan Dolan. 

Wow, could it be that our City (meaning us) will now have two "liabilities" to deal with.

Lee Tannenbaum
Scottsdale

 ~ Scottsdale Loses Business

I haven't been to or spent a dime in Scottsdale since the implementation of the cameras on the 101. I imagine I am not the only person who avoids Scottsdale because of the cameras. Do you think these cameras affect Scottsdale's businesses and your tax revenues?

Stacey Noel
A Valley Resident

Well Ozites, slap me again with 2 umpa lumpa turd’s, stand me in front of a traffic calming device after a few Mojitos and then car jack me if we did not call it on the money once again.

I got this the other day from a reliable source.

From: Dolan, Jan
Sent: Thu 8/2/2007 4:02 PM
To: City Council
Cc: Leadership Team; Register, Judy; Keagy, Raun; Hankins, Malcolm; Weiss, Kit
Subject: CNR GM Resigns

A short time ago, I reluctantly accepted the resignation of Citizen and Neighborhood Resources General Manager Judy Register.  Judy has been offered a similar position with the City of Chandler. Judy indicated to me that Chandler had approached her about the position. This is not surprising given that Judy has a long and successful record with the City including being the first CNR General Manager.  She is credited with creating the department where she has developed a great team and implemented innovative programs.  I am confident she will do the same for Chandler.  As noted, the department has great employees and I know they will continue Judy’s initiatives.  A special send off will be held before Judy departs at the end of the month.

Jan Dolan, City Manager
3939 N. Drinkwater Blvd.
Scottsdale, AZ 85251
480.312.2800
www.ScottsdaleAZ.gov

Now beyond the drivel applied to how great Judy Register was in the Wizards mind and the objections I could take with the Wizards comments I prefer to ask a few questions, you now, the ones the city never answers.

Was Judy not the head of the Library system and appointed to the position she held by non other then the Wizard herself?

Is it not true that we spouted that when Raun Keagy got his promotion and his raise that Register was on her way out the door?

Could it be that it was becoming all to clear that under her "leadership" public outreach took miserable turns for the worse?

Could it be that since Judy had already been under fire for such things as?

Meetings taking place that were documented but never even held?

Public Outreach that asked a question of, "do you like the entry island" instead of informing the residents of the problems?

The hump on Camelback not following procedures and policies as they did the whole shabang of outreach so to speak?

Piss poor oversight as it was brought forward by the city auditor regarding one of her departments she ruled over?

The entry island/traffic calming they did all over the South not following procedures or policies?

Now it appears she is heading to Chandler to accept a position of a "similar nature" and reportedly is the one that Raun Keagy turned down after the city handed him the reigns so to speak.

Yep folks the walls of the outhouse are crumbling even more than we may have thought as there is an exodus of staff leaving and funny how most of the ones we wished would leave are still hanging on.

I know Wizard (Jan Dolan) it was hard to accept yet another resignation from another department head and keeps your clock ticking faster as to when you will jump ship also with a great severance package.

That’s okay though as if the voters are smart, this time we will fix it so they all go or change their tunes after the elections.

And go figure that 5 of the 7 supposed leaders of Oz are still as witless as the summer day is long here in the Land of Oz.

 ~Bean Counter Jim (Lane)

Well we once asked how one of our supposed leaders, Bean Counter Jim could count refried beans and I guess we will have to see how it is done when the council returns to vote on Z lofts, Waterview, Orchid Tree, and a few others.

You see Bean Counter Jim has exclaimed about the predicted recession and even though all around his head the signs do indeed point to a recession coming, he continues to vote in favor of projects like the ones above that the market is falling out of the bottom of.

It appears the State ended their budget 255 million short of expected revenues and is attributed to things like

7.3 million dip in sales tax revenues for the first time in 4 years.

Individual income tax collections down 23.3 million from last year.

Okay Bean Counter Jim, this one is for you. "Attributed to a weak housing market"

Okay now Beanie Boy I know this may be hard for you to comprehend but figure these facts into your vote with a condo market that is going to umpa lumpa turds in short order.

What are the capitol improvement projects from the last budget session in taxpayers dollars going to cost us to date for the projects already approved?

How many of these units already approved have a 100% owner occupancy and are not rentals?

How much will the city go for in BOND money at the next election to fix the infrastructure issues that will again come with the projects you plan to approve?

If the Market is falling through the floor as it is now and has been doing since before the beginning of the year, how many people will buy these units when the umpa lumpa really hits the yellow brick road and prices fall only to see them become rentals?

If over half of what you approve does become rentals, how does that affect the desired result of richness you believe the downtown has?

You see Beanie Boy, there are many things that affect the market as I am sure you are already aware, but how aware of you of what happens to "community" when other markets falter and you keep approving the crap you do?

I am interested in hearing a response from Beanie Boy as to what the "Scottsdale Leadership Program" taught him about this.

Let’s hope we can hear a response from Beanie Boy before he turns us into California.

 ~The Gay side of Oz

Well it appears that the Gay community in Scottsdale is bent out of shape with the leadership of Oz.

Join the crowd and vote next year!

 ~ The Perennial "Secret" Activist

Mr. Kettle, Mr. Merrill, and Bean counter Jim................

Well here we go again with the ranting of a lunatic named Lisa Haskell.

Associated with non other than Virginia Korte, and Susan Bitter-Smith and begs the question of what those two were thinking when they hooked up with her?

Both are very intelligent women and have a good stature in the city so the question begs of, what’s up with this?

Again we received another letter from the kook of the South who "is not an activist" by her own mouth and it appears she must consider herself a special interest group of one. Funny thought, do you remember the words to Three Dog Night's song "One". One is the lonely number their can ever be… Funny stuff there Ozites so feel free to laugh and her is her most recent rant where she is on about Graham, Jim, and myself, enjoy the lunacy.

As it was sent to the council of Oz.

Apparently hypocrisy is alive and well in Scottsdale.. Interesting that Councilman Jim Lane, who espouses transparent government- the public has a right to know all - created a citizens ad hoc committee to review the city budget process. He has issues with the information provided to council by staff. Two of these ad hoc committee members selected by Lane, Graham Kettle and Lamar Whittmer have achieved some notoriety. Mr Kettle is a former member of COPP and Mr Whittmer orchestrated the successful effort to save Scottsdale area strip clubs from a more stringent  sexually oriented business ordinance. He has often worked behind the scenes to defeat/support propositions and support various candidates for council.Whether they are worthy of being supported doesn't seem to cause him many sleepless nights. Somewhat of a hired gun in keeping with Scottsdale's pseudo image as the West's most unwestern town. If Councilman Lane has concerns over the City of Scottsdale's budget process there is certainly nothing wrong with creating a citizen's ad hoc committee to review it. However, If he believes that city staff is not competent to evaluate the state of Scottsdale's finances or that they are not providing accurate information to council, don't residents have a right to review the backgrounds and qualifications of citizens that Councilman Lane appointed to this committee? Afterall, I am sure they are very qualified individuals but how do we know that? How do we know that their recommendations are any more reliable than the cities? If Councilman Lane does indeed believe the public is entitled to full disclosure on most issues , he should do no less. If you point fingers you should be able to withstand equal scrutiny. If not, get out of the kitchen. 

    The second nominee to the hypocricy Hall of Fame is local activist Mike Merrill, a man who has made it his life's work to attack city staff  and any resident who has the audacity to disagree with him. His concern over the cost of meals provided to those staff members ,council members and police officers that are forced to attend council meetings is touching. His concern over how taxpayer's money is spent is equally questionable given the fact that he has sent city staff on more wild goose chases than any other citizen- costing the long suffering taxpayers additional tax dollars in wasted staff time. The city is only too happy to waste taxpayers money and council does everything they can to appease him. An example of this idiocy? Mr Merrill has a small traffic island that was installed by the city almost a half mile from his home. Many of us have become victims of traffic calming devices that are far more intrusive  than the Gilligan's Island sized one in Mr Merrill's neighborhood. Mr Merrill, in his overzealous quest to have this island removed or modified, has created such a fuss that city staff was forced to canvas the area yet again to gather even more input from surrounding residents. They are awash in input. They need to quit while they are still behind. Their findings? The majority of those neighbors located in closer proximity to the island than Mr Merrill  supported it. In fact , they wanted it left alone. Mr Merrill , not concerned with anyones opinion or agenda other than his own, took his case to a Transportation Commission Meeting where he wasted even more time on this non issue. Browbeaten staff are planning to do another public meeting to evaluate support for a project that most in the area seemed to be in favor of. Residents of the area need to start asking how much this is costing the rest of us and doesn't city staff have better things to do with their time? Maybe they could accomplish something in other neighborhooods. We certainly have enough work to keep code enforcement busy  for years. Don't misunderstand . I live near the Oak Street Calming project and many of us were not overjoyed at its arrival either but we are not misguided enough to demand that the city remove it or modify it at even greater cost to taxpayers. 

    Some of us have decided to form our own adhoc committee the purpose of which is to research exactly how much " activism " run amuck is costing the rest of us taxpayers. Activist's crusades often have valid purposes unless the egos involved interfere with the real issues activists should be addressing. 

Lisa Haskell, Scottsdale

 ~A Canon for every South Scottsdale Home from Sky Swindle

Well I know Ozites in the South will be proud to know that the first retail vendor as Sky Swindle will be none other than a Canon location where they will occupy 9,000 square feet of Sky Sham’s first building with a ground floor (retail area) showroom, with office space on the fourth floor. Get this Southern Ozites, the Canon group have stated that they have no plans on conducting "research" in this space and that they needed more room from their "phoenix" location.

Wait, it gets a hell of a lot better for our retail thoughts as they also state that the ground level "showroom" will not be a retail "storefront" but will be a "place to display the companies products for potential customers".

Oh no, we are not done with this swindle by a long shot because Canon is also in bed with ASU from an "alliance" established last year between the two entities with Canon helping ASU with "document management issues" and to "explore" new technologies.

It appears that Sky Swindle is also not the correct place to open up a shop to "explore" those new technologies.

Wait, there is more great news about this as they intend to move a whole 50 employees to the site so I can take a wild guess that we have now rented 50 of the "market rate apartments" that the supposed leaders of Oz approved to wrap around the parking lot.

You can expect the council who does have a say in the lease of space to have a spirited debate and a 5 to 2 vote to approve the lease of ground floor space that is not retail to Canon with the stipulation that they provide a coffee and bagel vendor in the space so it can really be a retail section of the ground floor.

I promise to the Land of Oz to never again pursue the question of the retail portion of this project that was supposed to be for residents because anytime I start asking questions about the ‘retail’ portion of the site the residents get screwed again with a council approval.

This my fellow Ozites is yet another of the finest examples of being screwed over by the Wicked Witch’s version of helping out the South and her and the Wizards plans and thoughts of "how redevelopment works" in Oz along with those grand words of "vision" and "eclectic" as well as "24/7 live work play" which all result in the common phrase used by taxpayers and residents of, Bull Shit!

Too late now though folks as we are screwed blue and tattooed for the next 200 years.

My hat goes off to Michelle Aubert as she saw this well before I did and I should have joined the effort to place this fiasco on the ballot so it could be buried, my mistake.

 ~Downtown Sales BOOM, not really.......

Well this morning I read the online edition of the Oz Tribune and noted an article claiming that sales in Downtown Oz are booming and I thought, really?

With all of those condo projects not full and for a fact, most being emptied as investors got into them and then realized the market fell and they could not get their money back in a "quick flip" or the signs of Phase 2 of projects in limbo, apartments that went condo and then back to apartments, and things like Optima already going rental, but still no noticeable increase in those 24/7 residents of the "eclectic" nature or even the simple sign of that walk-able community the wicked witch and the wizard dreamed up I still give it 10 years or much less when we have to get the stupid stick out of the closet and go knock on some doors.

Then I read further to hear that the sales tax increased from a mark of May of last year, compared to May of this year netted a whopping increase of 38 million to a whole 39.1 million and that June of last year to June of this year showed a whopping 34.2 million to a whopping 34.8 million.

And who did we get to hear from that the papers talked to?

Fredrick R Unger, yep the same guy who wanted to amend the general plan with property he did not even own and who has had more code enforcement violations than any other business in the area for the last 2 years.

Of course we also got to hear from none other than the Downtown Mouth Piece Snidely Whiplash (John Little) who was removed from the transportation department by the Wizard and given the role of head of the Downtown Group of Oz.

Now Beanie Boy should take note of all the infrastructure costs that have been related to this "boom" in Downtown Oz like the new pump stations, the new fire houses, the new fire trucks for high rises, the increased police we never seem to see and other tricks of the Wizard and Wicked Witch which is resulting in digging into the taxpayers wallets.

Can anyone else smell the early version of Sky Swindle in this mess the city has created and the morons of the council that keep approving it?

Michael Merrill
F8713@aol.com

 ~ Have you heard  "One Issue" McCullagh's campaign slogan? If Littlefield and Nelssen are for it, I'll vote against them every time. Ain't he a real winner.......

~ Information You Can Use

Just click on the logos below to go to these websites.

Send our Brave Troops "Something from Home", Click on  Links below.

Gathering of  Eagles Website was launched 2/9/07. Click on the Logo above for more information on how they are protecting America's Memorials.

~ UPDATE!! A "Must See" for All Americans

Every American should check out all of these websites to learn more about what the American population is about to have to deal with.

This is NOT for Children.

I don't normally allow anything but Scottsdale information in the Scottsdale Activist but after receiving many emails about this and viewing it, I think that it's imperative that every adult at least look at what's offered here if for  nothing more than their own education and to have everyone stop and think about the future of our country. Click on the link below,

 www.obsessionthemovie.com

If you don't have Adobe Flash, install it from the bottom of the page that comes up after you click on the link above. You should be able to view all available links within the main page.

The website below is of great interest as seen from a Lebanese point of view:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8fa9yKQeTY

The website below gives some history of Terrorist attacks:

http://patriotfiles.org/civilizationcalls.htm

This website tell you what REALLY happened:

http://www.terrorismawareness.org/what-really-happened

(Return to Top)

~ Prop 13 Arizona

(Return to Top)

~ View Past City Council Meetings

We can now access the city council meetings by clicking on the following link:

If you have any problems, check your firewall and other safety features which could block access to the city site.

~Continuing Light Rail Information

The Scottsdale Citizens Transportation Study Committee invites you to view their website for more questions and answers at  www.norailforscottsdale.com .

================================================================

Simply click on the links below to get all the information you'll ever need concerning Light Rail.

     Goldwater Institute Report

     American Dream Coalition

    The Public Purpose

If you have any questions about light rail, send them to editor@scottsdaleactivist.com and we'll get the answers to you as soon as we can.

(Return to Top)

 

~ For Continuing Information on Photo Radar,
Click on the Logo below.

(Return to Top)

 ~Are Red-Light Cameras Fair to Drivers?

These modern-day robocops make ticketing easier and can be huge moneymakers for local governments. But critics question their accuracy and fret over privacy issues.

Click on the link below , then scroll down to read the article:

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Insurance/InsureYourCar/AreRedLightCamerasFairToDrivers.aspx

(Return to Top)

The Scottsdale Activist is very pleased to announce an effort on the behalf of the residents and taxpayers of the city of Scottsdale to promote open, honest and accountable city government. The Scottsdale Legal Defense Fund (SLDF) has been created to take legal action to hold the City accountable when its actions are contrary to state law, the City Charter, City ordinances or the public interest.

The most necessary ingredient to make the SLDF work will be confidential contributions from concerned Scottsdale citizens who are willing to help their community.  By contributing, we can change the way City Hall does business and insure that our tax dollars will be spent wisely.

No funds from the SLDF will or can be used for any political purpose.

Contributions shall be kept confidential as permissible by law and can be made in any Washington Mutual Bank to account number 3114165786 for the Scottsdale Legal Defense Fund. Branch locations are listed below. Contributions are not tax deductible.

The SLDF has retained the law firm of Miller LaSota & Peters, PLC, in connection with the patently illegal action taken by the Mayor and Council appointing the most recent Scottsdale City Attorney, while ignoring the residency requirement of the Scottsdale City Charter even though the new City Attorney’s contract (according to Scottsdale Republic reporter Laurie Roberts) requires that she reside in Scottsdale.  The City Council action was based on a legal opinion which was reportedly rendered during a closed door Executive Session of the City Council by a subordinate to the then acting City Attorney, who was subsequently appointed to the City Attorney position by a vote during a public City Council meeting. The opinion has been requested as a public document under state law, but the City has not yet provided it. The SLDF will take other appropriate legal actions based on the conduct of the Mayor and Council.

Washington Mutual Bank Locations at which contributions to the SLDF can be made are:

72^nd & Shea                    7337 E. Shea Blvd #120                480-609-8524
Hayden & Chaparral     7908 E. Chaparral # C-113            480-949-0069
Horizon                            14854 N Frank Lloyd Wright         480-614-6660
Scottsdale Ranch          10155 E. Via Linda Blvd #131       480-767-2060
Kierland Village              6501 E. Greenway Pkwy #133     480-315-2905

There are many other branches throughout the Valley.